When we think of the great philosophers of Ancient Greece, we think of Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle. Those great men have come down through the generations, but there is another man known in posterity whose stories were not meant for the elite class, but for the common folk. Aesop’s Fables are morality tales that were passed down orally for centuries until they were eventually written down. Aesop is rumored to have been a slave in either Greece or Ethiopia in the 6th or 5th century BCE. Somehow he gained his freedom and created these folktales that served as guides to moral living. It is likely that Aesop was real in the same sense that Homer was real, and that these stories have been altered and added to over the centuries. Aesop’s Fables have been reprinted, re-imagined, redrawn, and posted all over the internet. So why did John Cech do a retelling of the classics that is simplye entitled Aesop’s Fables? I’ll let you know when I figure it out.
If you are going to reinvent the wheel, at least put some new rims on it. I feel that John Cech really added nothing new to these stories. The premise of the book is simple—one blurb and one picture on one page for each fable—but it fails on the execution. Each story has a one-sentence moral written underneath it. I have read much better versions of these stories. I have loved the story of the mouse and the lion since I was a child. That story must be one of my earliest memories of reading, and this version did nothing to add to that memory. I remember learning “Le Cigale et la fourmi” (The Ant and the Grasshopper) in French. The story was about hunger and desperation and the need to prepare. Cech gives the story an almost literal meaning when the moral states that “If you don’t work in the summer, you’ll go hungry in the winter.” These morals are so much more than literal meanings. In the story of “The Bundle of Sticks,” where a man’s sons could not break the bundle as one, but could each break an individual stick, the moral is “Work together and you’ll be stronger.” Yes, this gets the message across, but I get no feeling from it. All of his morals and all of his fables fall flat in the face of all the wonderful versions that have already been done.
The only discernable reason I can manage to find to read John Cech’s Aesop’s Fables is the illustrations by Martin Jarrie—but even those are not for everyone. The illustrations try to capture the essence of each story in one picture. The perspective is all wrong, the characters are in twisted perspective reminiscent of Egyptian pyramid paintings, and I think the bird catcher on page 27 has a broken neck. Despite all this, there is something quite endearing about the pictures. I think that the facial expressions on both the animals and the humans may scare younger children, but I love the bright colors and the way the pictures have a sense of texture despite being completely flat. I also like that the author used a great deal of diversity in the illustrations; there is not just one or two different ethnicities, but a whole host of colors gracing the pages. Martin Jarrie has a blog called “Drawn!” that is currently down right now, but he promises it will be back up soon and urges you to follow him on Twitter until it is back up.
I do not think I would use this book when I teach about Aesop’s Fables to my students. The only time I would actually use this book would probably be in the fourth or fifth grade if I wanted students to compare different interpretations. I could group students and give all of them the same story, but written by a different author and pictures by a different illustrator. Then all the students could write the things they liked and did not like about the book. I think it would be a great way to encourage students to become critical thinkers about different texts.
If this book were some story that was Cech’s own invention, I may not be so harsh on it: but Cech chose to take something that many hold dear and try to add to it. If it is not broke, John Cech (and it isn’t), do not try to fix it.
If this book were some story that was Cech’s own invention, I may not be so harsh on it: but Cech chose to take something that many hold dear and try to add to it. If it is not broke, John Cech (and it isn’t), do not try to fix it.




